← Search

Emily Won

Short Hills, NJ
4.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
18 matches · 11W–7L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Emily Won to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history18 matches
L
2025-11-13 · Centercourt Chatham · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emi Chalker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-16 · Centercourt Chatham · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Miki Beatty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2022-06-02 · Daisey Cutters · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Bu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2022-03-03 · Centercourt Chatham · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Angela Lin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2022-02-24 · Centercourt Chatham · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margot Small
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2022-02-17 · Centercourt Chatham · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margaret Haughey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2022-01-13 · Centercourt Chatham · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margot Small
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-5
W
2021-11-18 · Centercourt Chatham · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margot Small
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2021-11-04 · Centercourt Chatham · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Deluca
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-5, 0-1
W
2019-07-15 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emi Chalker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
Amira Issa / Victoria Vigil
2019-07-08 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Emi Chalker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2019-06-24 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shana Teitelbaum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
64.7%
11W–6L · 56.7% of games
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 83% of the time
#3 Doubles
83%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
2 matches
#1 Doubles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova