← Search

Jill Belau

Meridian, ID
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
129 matches · 83W–46L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jill Belau to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history129 matches
W
2026-06-29 · NetChix 18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Courtney Hobbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-24 · NetChix 18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monica Reagan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-22 · NetChix 18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Floyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-03 · NetChix 18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Floyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-4
W
2026-05-27 · NetChix 18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessika Hulewsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-18 · NetChix 18 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mandy Bergstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-14 · Servivors · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dawn Crochet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-30 · Servivors · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessika Hulewsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-23 · Servivors · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dawn Crochet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-04-14 · Servivors · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dawn Crochet
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-02 · Servivors · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Floyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-31 · Servivors · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christina Floyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0
64.9%
50W–27L · 56.1% of games
8.0
72.7%
16W–6L · 59.8% of games
7.5mixed
55%
11W–9L · 49.4% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 46.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
38 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal