← Search

Ginger Oakes

SAN JOSE, CA
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
11 matches · 3W–8L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Ginger Oakes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history11 matches
L
2026-05-16 · BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AW2.5A · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Cynthia Yuan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-09 · BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AW2.5A · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kim Burrill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-04-27 · BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AW2.5A · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kim Burrill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-19 · BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AW2.5A · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kim Burrill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2021-05-13 · #1 Singles · 2.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2020-12-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brenda Kenny
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2020-12-03 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
Erika Mcveigh / Mary Davis
2020-11-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Debbie Kinney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
Lyn Clark / Yvette Cronon
2019-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cheryl Giles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
Lorri Honea / Heather Hawkins
2019-06-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Theresa Hunsucker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2019-05-16 · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
2.5
40%
2W–3L · 48.8% of games
3.0
16.7%
1W–5L · 35.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
3 matches
#2 Singles
18%
2 matches
#1 Singles
9%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova