← Search

Cleo Collier

Riverside, CA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
152 matches · 88W–64L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Cleo Collier to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history152 matches
L
2026-08-16 · IE-Andulka-Pereya · #1 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jannah Carrasco
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-25 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-24 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-11 · IE-Andulka-Pereya · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Clark mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-28 · OC Heritage Park - Alicia - Sun3 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-19 · OC FW Irvine Great Park - Dianne - 1030 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-07 · IE-LLW-Andulka-Curtiss · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-31 · OC Heritage Park - Alicia - Sun3 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-05-30 · IE-Andulka-Pereya · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dafry Nesamony mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-24 · IE-LLW-Andulka-Curtiss · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-15 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-08 · OC FW Irvine Great Park - Dianne - 1030 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 57.8% of games
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
90.5%
19W–2L · 64.6% of games
3.5
58.9%
56W–39L · 56% of games
4.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 44.4% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 52% of the time
#1 Singles
52%
79 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
17 matches
#2 Singles
9%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
12 matches
#3 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams