← Search

Glenn Friedman

Westminster, CO
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 21W–20L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Glenn Friedman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
L
2026-08-06 · NJ NAVY · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Gillespie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
2026-07-23 · NJ NAVY · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Mullins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-02 · NJ NAVY · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Gillespie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-04 · NJ BLUE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Gillespie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-21 · NJ BLUE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Messer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-16 · NJ BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nathaniel Strout
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-07 · NJ BLUE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Farhad Noorbakhsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2024-07-16 · NJ YELLOW · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2024-07-02 · NJ YELLOW · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Messer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2024-06-14 · NJ RED · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christopher Johnstone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2024-06-07 · NJ RED · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hank Fisher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2024-05-24 · NJ RED · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Hank Fisher
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 48.6% of games
4.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0
66.7%
10W–5L · 52.7% of games
8.0
60%
3W–2L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
13 matches
#1 Singles
10%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova