Cathy Siegal
Park City, UT
84 matches · 54W–30L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Cathy Siegal to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history84 matches
L
Ann Diver-Diehl / Judith Simonini
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
Jemma Craig / Leanna Kehm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 3-2
W
Daniella Norwood / Linda Ford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Alice Kim / Katherine Linton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 6-5
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
Alice Kim / Nicolina Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 6-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
Cristiana Quinn / Janet Marrinan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
Kathleen Farrell / Erika Etienvre
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
Cynthia Gavin / Kathleen Farrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
78.9%
15W–4L · 63.1% of games
3.5
63.2%
24W–14L · 55.2% of games
6.0
81.8%
9W–2L · 60.7% of games
7.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 46.5% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
16 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches
#3 Female Doubles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.