← Search

Carrie Frith

Hopewell Junction, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
70 matches · 23W–47L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Carrie Frith to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history70 matches
L
2026-08-16 · Mixed Magic · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Birgler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-08-09 · Mixed Magic · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Birgler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-05 · Mixed Magic · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Birgler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
W
N/A
2026-06-12 · MH:TSR Insta-Slam · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-10 · MH:TSR Insta-Slam · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexandra Choi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-06-03 · MH:TSR Insta-Slam · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-06-01 · TSR: Synergy · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-29 · MH:TSR Insta-Slam · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Yi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-04 · TSR: Synergy · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexandra Choi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-12 · Taconic Tri Breakers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Yi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-29 · Taconic Tri Breakers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rika Tanous
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-22 · Taconic Tri Breakers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Hickey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
46.2%
6W–7L · 51.7% of games
4.0
35.9%
14W–25L · 41.1% of games
7.0mixed
18.8%
3W–13L · 37.6% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
19 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
17 matches
#1 Singles
9%
6 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal