← Search

Brad Campbell

SAMMAMISH, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
50 matches · 29W–21L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Brad Campbell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history50 matches
L
2026-06-15 · #1 Doubles · with Mikel Morrow championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-19 · NWW-AYTC-Edwards · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mikel Morrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-04-28 · NWW-AYTC-Edwards · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mikel Morrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-04-20 · NWW-AYTC-Edwards · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mikel Morrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-02-28 · PL-Thaker · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mikel Morrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-01-25 · PL-Thaker · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mikel Morrow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-3
L
2025-03-30 · #3 Doubles · with Manivel Chandrasekaran championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-03-29 · #3 Doubles · with Manivel Chandrasekaran championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-03-22 · #3 Doubles · with Manivel Chandrasekaran championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-03-16 · NWW-PL-Raman · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Manivel Chandrasekaran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-03-08 · NWW-PL-Raman · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Manivel Chandrasekaran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-02-23 · NWW-PL-Raman · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Manivel Chandrasekaran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams29 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
54.2%
13W–11L · 54% of games
6.0
75%
6W–2L · 61.7% of games
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 56.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
19 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams