← Search

Michael Gaberman

Mercer Island, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
102 matches · 53W–49L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Michael Gaberman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history102 matches
W
2026-03-15 · MI-Wannabees-Mattox · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Charlie Mills
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-02-27 · MI-Wannabees-Mattox · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cameron Hykes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-02-07 · MI-Wannabees-Mattox · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dean Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-02-01 · MI-Wannabees-Mattox · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sanjiv Parikh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-01-17 · MI-Wannabees-Mattox · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bernard Hensey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-01-04 · MI-Wannabees-Mattox · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christian Schiller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2025-07-31 · Shock-and-Awe · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brendon Wu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-25 · Shock-and-Awe · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brendon Wu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-07-20 · Shock-and-Awe · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brendon Wu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2025-07-18 · Shock-and-Awe · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brendon Wu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-13 · Shock-and-Awe · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brendon Wu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-06-24 · Shock-and-Awe · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brendon Wu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
63.3%
31W–18L · 56.9% of games
4.0
32.1%
9W–19L · 45.5% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
25%
2W–6L · 41.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
22 matches
#1 Singles
6%
6 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert