← Search

Bhaskara Bandi

Portland, OR
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
39 matches · 23W–16L · seasons 2022–2025

Captains: add Bhaskara Bandi to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history39 matches
W
2025-03-09 · SAC-Bandi/Elmer · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nathan Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2025-02-21 · SAC-Bandi/Elmer · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mauro Kobrinsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-02-15 · SAC-Bandi/Elmer · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nathan Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-01-05 · SAC-Bandi/Elmer · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nathan Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2024-11-02 · SAC-Cheema/Larson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Melissa Tom mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2024-09-28 · SAC-Cheema/Larson · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Melissa Tom mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2024-06-23 · SAC-Anderson/Elmer · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nathan Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2024-05-18 · SAC-Anderson/Elmer · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nathan Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2024-05-11 · SAC-Anderson/Elmer · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Chapler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2024-04-20 · SAC-Anderson/Elmer · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Harvey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-04-14 · SAC-Anderson/Elmer · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nathan Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
N/A
2024-03-16 · SAC-Anderson/Elmer · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nathan Watson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2013–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
64.5%
20W–11L · 51.6% of games
6.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer