← Search

Abby Dennett

Houston, TX
5.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
78 matches · 47W–31L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Abby Dennett to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history78 matches
W
2026-08-25 · LLTC - Trilobites · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Neha Shaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-08-05 · LLTC - Trilobites · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Neha Shaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-19 · MPTC - Love All · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-12 · MPTC - Love All · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-05-05 · MPTC - Love All · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Neha Shaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-28 · MPTC - Love All · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Neha Shaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-04-26 · LLTC - Game Theory · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ethan Cho mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-14 · MPTC - Love All · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Rachel Howie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-03-24 · LLTC - Love All · #1 Doubles · with Neha Shaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-03-17 · LLTC - Love All · #2 Doubles · with Cecilia Tetlow
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-02-24 · LLTC - Love All · #1 Doubles · with Neha Shaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-02-18 · MPTC - Slice Girls · #2 Singles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
80%
4W–1L · 59.4% of games
4.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 63.5% of games
4.5
55%
11W–9L · 55.3% of games
5.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 45.1% of games
9.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 40.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
9 matches
#1 Singles
9%
7 matches
#2 Singles
6%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams