← Search

Jeff Rosenblum

Annandale, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
163 matches · 96W–67L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Jeff Rosenblum to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history163 matches
W
2026-07-23 · Inanlar - Courtmasters · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ahmed Hussain
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-19 · Inanlar - Courtmasters · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joel Velasquez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-09 · Inanlar - Courtmasters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vijay Kalanadhabhatta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-2
L
2026-07-08 · Team 8 Pirates Over 40 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joong Min
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-28 · Inanlar - Courtmasters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Hecker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-20 · Team 8 Pirates Over 40 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Neil McConnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-15 · Team 8 Pirates Over 40 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-07 · Team 8 Pirates Over 40 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-17 · Rogers · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-04-28 · Team 6 Who Is We? Z's Last Chance Saloon · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joong Min
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-04-25 · Rogers · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-4
L
2026-04-18 · Rogers · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams83 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
60.2%
68W–45L · 53.9% of games
4.5
50%
4W–4L · 41% of games
4.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
55.2%
16W–13L · 51.7% of games
8.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
43 matches
#1 Singles
23%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
21 matches
#2 Singles
9%
15 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova