← Search

David Crisp

Naples, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 11W–30L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add David Crisp to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
L
2026-05-19 · Cambier / Packo · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michael Vance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-13 · Cambier / Packo · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Schmieg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-06 · Cambier / Packo · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Timothy Ryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-05 · Cambier / Packo · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michael Vance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-22 · Cambier / Packo · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marc Fitzgerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-21 · Cambier / Packo · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Packo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-08 · Cambier / Packo · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marc Fitzgerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-04-01 · Cambier / Packo · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Timothy Ryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-25 · Cambier / Packo · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Timothy Ryan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-24 · Cambier / Packo · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michael Vance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-04 · Winter Winners/Cambier / Packo · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jake Healey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-03 · Cambier / Packo · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Vance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 44.1% of games
4.0
18.8%
3W–13L · 41.1% of games
7.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 40% of games
7.5
0%
0W–4L · 29.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 46% of the time
#2 Doubles
46%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
9 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert