← Search

Graham Jacobson

Mount Pleasant, SC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
78 matches · 18W–60L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Graham Jacobson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history78 matches
W
2026-09-01 · LCTA40/Durst/Brickyard · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with William Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-20 · LCTA40/Durst/Brickyard · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brian Boss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-06 · LCTA40/Durst/Brickyard · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brian Boss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-23 · LCTA40/Durst/Brickyard · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Luc Chasleries
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-09 · LCTA40/Durst/Brickyard · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Luc Chasleries
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-15 · LCTA18/Wermuth/Brickyard · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gretchen Looney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-08 · LCTA18/Wermuth/Brickyard · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gretchen Looney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-11 · LCTA18/Wermuth/Brickyard · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ann Spicher mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-16 · LCTA40/Durst/Brickyard · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tom Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-26 · LCTA40/Durst/Brickyard · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Spychalski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-03-25 · LCTA40/Boss/Brickyard · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steve Rodehorst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-19 · LCTA40/Durst/Brickyard · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 51% of games
3.5
20%
8W–32L · 35.8% of games
6.5
25%
4W–12L · 41.9% of games
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0%
0W–10L · 20.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
22 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer