← Search

Tim Pelczar

— year-end
49 matches · 36W–13L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Tim Pelczar to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history49 matches
L
2026-05-16 · EASOM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Franklin Cassada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-05 · Richez CP · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Franklin Cassada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
Hiep Nguyen / Son Nguyen
2026-04-25 · Richez CP · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Franklin Cassada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-14 · EASOM · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-04-11 · Richez CP · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Droulette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-09 · EASOM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paul Niggebrugge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-08 · Richez CP · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Franklin Cassada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-03-28 · Richez CP · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Droulette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-03-25 · Richez CP · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Franklin Cassada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-23 · Goh/Sass · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Terry Bell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-22 · EASOM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Franklin Cassada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-21 · Richez CP · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Droulette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
Teams25 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
76.5%
26W–8L · 60.7% of games
4.0
50%
2W–2L · 52.9% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 54.7% of games
7.5
60%
3W–2L · 54.7% of games
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
21 matches
#1 Singles
27%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams