← Search

Vincent McGahay

— year-end
96 matches · 57W–39L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Vincent McGahay to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history96 matches
W
Jeffrey Stein / Chase Williamson
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel LoGiurato
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
Rod Mano / John Muller
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Melville
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-12 · Solo Men's Tri 4.0 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Foret
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-15 · Solo Men's Tri 4.0 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Steffes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-08-16 · #2 Doubles · with James Steffes championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-07-26 · #2 Doubles · with Prabhas Viswanathan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-07-20 · PTC: Clay Sera Sera · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Daniel LoGiurato
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-07-19 · Southern: Dutchess Racquet · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Melville
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2025-07-10 · Dutchess Racquet · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Prabhas Viswanathan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-06-29 · PTC: Clay Sera Sera · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Samuel Moyer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W
2025-06-28 · PTC: Clay Sera Sera · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brian Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-06-25 · Dutchess Racquet · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Neil Peruffo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
Teams18 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
79.6%
39W–10L · 65.3% of games
3.5
41.2%
7W–10L · 45.5% of games
4.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
11.1%
1W–8L · 35.4% of games
7.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 50.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
29 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer