← Search

Gary Covitz

Belmont, NC
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
60 matches · 38W–22L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Gary Covitz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
W
2026-07-08 · NChristensen (Southampton) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Bost mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-19 · NChristensen (Southampton) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Bost mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-17 · NChristensen (Southampton) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Bost mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-10 · JFulcomer/KFulcomer (Southampton) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dorothy Ilse mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-08 · NChristensen (Southampton) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Bost mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-03 · JFulcomer/KFulcomer (Southampton) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dorothy Ilse mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
Peter Hornbach / Jim Smith
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · with John Weber championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
John Plourde / Charles Lee
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · with John Weber championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · with John Weber championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-15 · #2 Doubles · with John Weber championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-14 · #1 Doubles · with John Weber championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
Steven Kolb / Jeff Walker
2026-05-14 · #2 Doubles · with John Weber championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
100%
5W–0L · 70.9% of games
4.0
62.5%
10W–6L · 51.1% of games
7.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 56.3% of games
3.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 53.2% of games
4.0mixed
50%
5W–5L · 48% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert