← Search

David Hitchcock

Columbia, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
66 matches · 36W–30L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add David Hitchcock to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history66 matches
W
2026-03-30 · CTL40/Hitchcock/SEP · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Avula Mallikarjuna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
L
2026-03-09 · CTL40/Hitchcock/SEP · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
Christopher Smith
2026-02-23 · CTL40/Hitchcock/SEP · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-02-16 · CTL40/Hitchcock/SEP · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-11-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kumar Ramaswamy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kumar Ramaswamy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
Edwin Martin Jr / Christopher Smith
2025-10-26 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jim Powell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-10-20 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Junis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-13 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kumar Ramaswamy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
Michael Barker
2025-04-14 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-04-09 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
Michael Barker
2025-03-24 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
4.0
54.5%
36W–30L · 51.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 58% of the time
#1 Singles
58%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
8 matches
#2 Singles
11%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert