← Search

Tracey Belmont

— year-end
56 matches · 23W–33L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Tracey Belmont to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
L
2026-07-25 · Snyder/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Edgar Lara-Curzio mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-18 · Snyder/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Edgar Lara-Curzio mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-07-17 · Snyder/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Edgar Lara-Curzio mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-08 · Snyder/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ben Morton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · Uhlenhake/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Roback
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-02 · Uhlenhake/Knoxville · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Warrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-04-30 · Spurgin/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessie Ostrowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
Nicole White / Michelle Uhlenhake
2026-04-23 · Epps/Knoxville · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeanne Blake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-04-19 · Epps/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacey Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
Susan Bishofberger / Heather Wilson
2026-04-16 · Spurgin/Knoxville · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Roback
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-04-09 · Spurgin/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Roback
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Nicole White / Annie Adams
2026-03-29 · Epps/Knoxville · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacey Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
Teams40 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
42.9%
15W–20L · 48.5% of games
4.0
25%
1W–3L · 29% of games
6.5
40%
2W–3L · 43.4% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
9 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer