← Search

Jacqueline Wallace

PENSACOLA, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
143 matches · 80W–63L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Jacqueline Wallace to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history143 matches
W
2026-04-14 · Nguyen - RS Clay · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tanya Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Mary Bryan / Ashley Wheeler
2026-04-07 · Nguyen - RS Clay · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mecy Wimberly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-28 · Wallace - RS Clay · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chelsea Simpson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-21 · Wallace - RS Clay · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristyn Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-17 · Wallace - RS Clay · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with George Rials mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-15 · GS-Anderson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kenneth Wallace mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-08 · GS-Anderson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craig Abel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-02-08 · Wallace - RS Clay · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristyn Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-02-04 · Wallace - RS Clay · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Craig Abel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
Liz Payne / Christopher Brown
2026-01-28 · Wallace - RS Clay · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with George Rials mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-01-24 · Wallace - RS Clay · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristyn Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-21 · Wallace - RS Clay · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Craig Abel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
36.7%
11W–19L · 43.7% of games
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
76.9%
10W–3L · 56.9% of games
7.5
41.7%
10W–14L · 46.1% of games
3.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 41.3% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
20W–10L · 54.2% of games
8.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 62.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
50 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
43 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer