← Search

Aric Margolis

Charleston, WV
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
66 matches · 39W–27L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Aric Margolis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history66 matches
W
2026-08-04 · CTC Hussell · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Goins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-21 · CTC Hussell · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Spriggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-30 · CTC Hussell · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-12 · CTC Goins/Nassif · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andy Elliot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-17 · CTC Goins/Nassif · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Jacobs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Richard Pickens / John Ponugupati
2026-02-15 · CTC Goins/Nassif · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Jacobs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-11-02 · CTC Elliot · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Hanna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2025-10-22 · CTC Elliot · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Hanna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2025-05-04 · CTC Helmick/Elliot · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Jacobs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2025-04-05 · CTC Helmick/Elliot · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-03-15 · CTC Helmick/Elliot · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonah Ball
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L
2025-02-22 · CTC Helmick/Elliot · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Jacobs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
64.8%
35W–19L · 56.9% of games
7.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 39.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
8 matches
#1 Singles
11%
7 matches
#2 Singles
6%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe