← Search

Adnan Kazazic

Cleveland, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
249 matches · 116W–133L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Adnan Kazazic to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history249 matches
L
2026-07-23 · A55 7.0M MM Ghosh · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Chambers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
Rebecca Taylor / Connor Savage
2026-07-19 · X18 6.0 MM Bode · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sanita Kazazic mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-12 · X18 6.0 MM Bode · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sanita Kazazic mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-21 · X18 6.0 MM Bode · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sanita Kazazic mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-11 · A55 7.0M MM Ghosh · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Botio Nikov
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-10 · A40 3.5M MM2 Tyrrell · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jim Tyrrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-04 · A55 7.0M MM Ghosh · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Celso Castillo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-03 · A40 3.5M MM2 Tyrrell · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with George Mass
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · X18 6.0 MM Bode · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Sanita Kazazic mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-20 · A40 3.5M MM2 Tyrrell · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-05-14 · A55 7.0M MM Ghosh · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bradley Beverly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-13 · A40 3.5M MM2 Tyrrell · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with George Mass
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams54 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
61.2%
49W–31L · 54.9% of games
3.5
28.8%
15W–37L · 41.5% of games
6.5
54.1%
20W–17L · 51.1% of games
7.0
9.1%
1W–10L · 34% of games
5.5mixed
100%
7W–0L · 71.8% of games
6.0mixed
40.8%
20W–29L · 46.2% of games
7.0mixed
30.8%
4W–9L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
80 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
77 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
57 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
17 matches
#1 Singles
6%
15 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert