← Search

Jeff Sterling

Hudson, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
136 matches · 82W–54L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeff Sterling to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history136 matches
W
Patrick Smith / George Raguz
2026-07-30 · A55 7.0M LT Crawford · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Denholm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · A55 7.0M LT Crawford · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Doug Wirt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
Robert Moore / Troy Smith
2026-07-08 · A40 3.5M LT Fiedler · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Thompson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-06-25 · A55 7.0M LT Crawford · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with George Ciardi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-18 · A55 7.0M LT Crawford · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Doug Wirt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-17 · A40 3.5M LT Fiedler · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Bunge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-11 · A55 7.0M LT Crawford · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with NEIL MCHALE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-14 · A55 7.0M LT Crawford · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeffrey Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-06-19 · NEO/Fiedler/A40/3.5M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Geoff Fiedler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2025-06-05 · NEO/Fiedler/A40/3.5M · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brian Vaught
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-05-29 · NEO/Fiedler/A40/3.5M · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Quist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-05-22 · NEO/Fiedler/A40/3.5M · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Quist
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
76%
19W–6L · 62.5% of games
3.5
51.7%
30W–28L · 51.1% of games
6.5
66.7%
10W–5L · 50.8% of games
7.0
50%
3W–3L · 47.1% of games
6.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 55.7% of games
7.0mixed
63.6%
14W–8L · 51.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
28 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams