← Search

Cherlyn Linden

Denver, CO
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
174 matches · 83W–91L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cherlyn Linden to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history174 matches
L
2026-06-15 · DTC RED · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-3
L
2026-06-14 · DTC RED · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Suter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-11 · DTC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pamela Marsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-10 · DTC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marcy Eastman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-08 · DTC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Pianowski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-06-07 · DTC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Evan Pfaff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-03 · DTC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy McIlroy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-02 · DTC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Catie Grimes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-31 · DTC RED · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matt Emmons mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-28 · DTC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pamela Marsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-27 · DTC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marcy Eastman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-05-25 · DTC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sheri Jacobs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
39.1%
9W–14L · 42.5% of games
3.0
53.5%
46W–40L · 51.8% of games
6.0
70%
14W–6L · 57.1% of games
6.0mixed
47.4%
9W–10L · 48.1% of games
6.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 57.5% of games
7.0mixed
10.5%
2W–17L · 35.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
69 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
38 matches
#1 Singles
5%
8 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams