← Search

Bronwen Richardson

Roswell, GA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
68 matches · 43W–25L · seasons 2021–2027

Captains: add Bronwen Richardson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
W
2026-06-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Paige Peck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-06-13 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-23 · Kelly/Dellinger · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-03-09 · Kelly/Dellinger · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-02-16 · Kubow/Dellinger · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-01-19 · Kubow/Dellinger · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-13 · Hickory Springs (Elizabeth Smith)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Suing
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 7-6
W
Jennifer Knox
2026-01-08 · Hardage Farms (Marianne Gopel)* · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2025-12-29 · EVTA/Dana Kubow · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
Barbara Marcus / Susan Williams
2025-12-09 · Hickory Springs (Elizabeth Smith)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynn Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2025-11-24 · EVTA/Dana Kubow · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-18 · Hickory Springs (Elizabeth Smith)* · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
63.1%
41W–24L · 55.6% of games
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 31% of the time
#1 Singles
31%
21 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
12 matches
#2 Singles
18%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer