← Search

Sarah Pounders

— year-end
66 matches · 50W–16L · seasons 2023–2027

Captains: add Sarah Pounders to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history66 matches
W
2026-09-12 · BP - Olszewski/Pounders · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-19 · BP - Olszewski/Brooks · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Aimee Bellmore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-16 · DP - Bristol (8.5) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jennifer Stupica
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-13 · SGC-Harper/Thomas 2026 Summer Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Lively
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · DP - Bristol (8.5) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Anna K Amerson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · BP - Olszewski/Brooks · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Anna Berwitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-07-09 · SGC-Harper/Thomas 2026 Summer Tri · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amelia Harper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · BP - Bristol · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Howard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-05-26 · BP - Bristol · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Howard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-21 · BP - Pounders/Olszewski · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-14 · BP - Pounders/Olszewski · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-03-07 · BP - Pounders/Olszewski · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Teams39 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
100%
6W–0L · 70.7% of games
4.0
75%
36W–12L · 58.9% of games
7.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 59.5% of games
8.5
25%
1W–3L · 48.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
11 matches
#1 Singles
15%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
9 matches
#2 Singles
6%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova