← Search

Catalina Betancur

Athens, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
17 matches · 11W–6L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add Catalina Betancur to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history17 matches
W
2026-07-27 · COTA/Cheryl Dean · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jarrod Prickett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · COTA/Cheryl Dean · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jarrod Prickett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · COTA/Cheryl Dean · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wes Ivester mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-02 · COTA/Cheryl Dean · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jarrod Prickett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-03-26 · OVP/Dean L-3 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maureen Truett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-03-17 · OVP/Dean/Jones · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Loretta Newcomer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
Kimberly Smith / Amanda Wilson
2026-03-14 · COTA/Cheryl Dean · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maureen Truett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Kimberly Smith / Deborah Googe
2026-03-08 · OVP/Dean/Jones · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Wozniak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-01 · OVP/Dean/Jones · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Wozniak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-28 · COTA/Cheryl Dean · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maureen Truett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-02-15 · OVP/Dean/Jones · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristin Wozniak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-02-14 · COTA/Cheryl Dean · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maureen Truett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2026–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 60.5% of games
4.0
0%
0W–4L · 23.4% of games
3.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 57.3% of games
7.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe