← Search

Nachiko Yamamoto

Rochester, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
37 matches · 11W–26L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Nachiko Yamamoto to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history37 matches
W
2026-05-14 · SWW-VAC-Ryan · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristine Cramer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7
W
2026-05-07 · SWW-VAC-Ryan · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kristine Cramer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-01 · SWW-VAC-Ryan · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Connie Ray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · VAC-Koeppen-Tie Breakers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ellen Stagnone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-15 · SWW-VAC-Ryan · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Deborah Sargeant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-04-12 · VAC-Koeppen-Tie Breakers · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Koeppen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-15 · STAC-Stedham-Underwood Orphans · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Fischer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-03-08 · STAC-Stedham-Underwood Orphans · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anne Marie Stedham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-01 · STAC-Stedham-Underwood Orphans · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Erin Fischer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-02-22 · STAC-Stedham-Underwood Orphans · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jan Bradshaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-01 · STAC-Stedham-Underwood Orphans · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jan Bradshaw
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-01-24 · STAC-Stedham-Underwood Orphans · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Nielson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
18.2%
4W–18L · 38.2% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 50.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
46%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova