← Search

Jenny Fobart

Cumming, GA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 45W–19L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Jenny Fobart to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
2026-05-19 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6
W
2026-01-13 · Fields Club (Cathi Levinson)* · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 6-2
W
2026-01-06 · Fields Club (Cathi Levinson)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Beniamino
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2025-07-10 · Wexford (Amanda Neal)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Frate
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-05-15 · Wexford (Amanda Neal)* · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Hagan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2024-11-21 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-11-07 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2024-07-16 · Westbrook (Jeni Fobart)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Arrie Lugar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2024-06-26 · Westbrook (Jeni Fobart)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Shaughnessy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2024-06-20 · Central Park (Stacey Smith)* · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-06-18 · Westbrook (Jeni Fobart)* · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amber Rice
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2024-06-13 · Central Park (Stacey Smith)* · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
87.5%
14W–2L · 73.7% of games
3.5
82.4%
14W–3L · 61.4% of games
4.0
54.8%
17W–14L · 52.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 38% of the time
#1 Singles
38%
24 matches
#2 Singles
38%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
5%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
3%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova