← Search

Christy Lee

Granger, IN
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
69 matches · 31W–38L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Christy Lee to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history69 matches
L
2026-07-28 · NIN SB 18&O 3.5 W: SBRC Bona/Rink · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mitzi Holland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2024-11-09 · NIN SB Combo 8.5 W Weekend: Simeri · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Caroline Hammond Varga
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-5, 1-0
W
2024-07-29 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Fran Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2024-07-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claudia Cochran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2024-07-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claudia Cochran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
Vickie Schoeffler / Staci Anagnos
2024-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christa Crawford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
2024-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Fran Kelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2024-07-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christa Crawford
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2024-07-02 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Claudia Cochran
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2024-06-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margaret Cuson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
Vickie Schoeffler / Jill Sigsbee
2024-06-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mitzi Holland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2024-06-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathleen Bona
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
52.8%
19W–17L · 49.5% of games
4.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 20.4% of games
6.5
50%
3W–3L · 48.2% of games
7.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 53.8% of games
8.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 46.3% of games
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
16%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer