← Search

Brenda Slagle

Minneapolis, MN
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
24 matches · 6W–18L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Brenda Slagle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history24 matches
L
2026-07-27 · Simply Smashing Ulmer/Wedell · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Colleen Malmgren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-23 · Soberg: 3.0 Slice Squad · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liz Dymoke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-09 · Soberg: 3.0 Slice Squad · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Soberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-06 · Simply Smashing Ulmer/Wedell · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Vivienne Albano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-18 · Soberg: 3.0 Slice Squad · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Soberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-11 · Soberg: 3.0 Slice Squad · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Soberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-01 · Simply Smashing Ulmer/Wedell · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Vivienne Albano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-28 · Soberg: 3.0 Slice Squad · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ericka McKenzie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-21 · Soberg: 3.0 Slice Squad · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Beth Soberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-04 · Simply Smashing Ulmer/Wedell · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lanette Wedell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-12 · Soberg: 3.0 Slice Squad · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liz Dymoke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-02-05 · Soberg: 3.0 Slice Squad · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Xin Wang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
30%
6W–14L · 40.8% of games
6.0
0%
0W–4L · 23.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 92% of the time
#3 Doubles
92%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
8%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer