← Search

Sarah Overholser

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
189 matches · 123W–66L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sarah Overholser to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history189 matches
L
2026-07-09 · Ma.Zimardo18S · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-18 · Ma.Zimardo18S · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-05-29 · Ma.Zimardo18S · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-05-14 · Te.Paschaloudis40A · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-05-07 · Te.Paschaloudis40A · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-05-05 · An.Jones18A · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-17 · NMAC.Jones · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
Suzanne Brown
2026-04-16 · Te.Paschaloudis40A · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-04-14 · An.Jones18A · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-04-09 · Te.Paschaloudis40A · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-02 · Te.Paschaloudis40A · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-27 · NMAC.Jones · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
78.8%
93W–25L · 62.4% of games
3.5
43.4%
23W–30L · 47.3% of games
6.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 44.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 56% of the time
#1 Singles
56%
106 matches
#2 Singles
27%
50 matches
#3 Singles
12%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
4%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer