← Search

Dawn Wildfeuer

Rochester, MN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
24 matches · 20W–4L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Dawn Wildfeuer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history24 matches
W
2026-07-21 · Acers Hagy RTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Bauer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-07-14 · Acers Hagy RTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lixia Yang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-01 · Chalmers/Wildfeuer RAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Chalmers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-24 · Chalmers/Wildfeuer RAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-0
W
2026-06-02 · Acers Hagy RTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lixia Yang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-27 · Chalmers/Wildfeuer RAC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Obert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-20 · Chalmers/Wildfeuer RAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Chalmers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-03 · Chalmers/Cerhan RAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Chalmers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-04-12 · Chalmers/Cerhan RAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diana Kelm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-03-26 · Chalmers/Cerhan RAC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diana Kelm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-01 · 2026 Chambers/Singh RAC · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Fabricio Amorim mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-01 · 2026 Chambers/Singh RAC · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with ZACHARY YEADON mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
88.2%
15W–2L · 64.4% of games
4.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 58.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 58% of the time
#2 Doubles
58%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert