← Search

Chad Huseman

Amarillo, TX
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
14 matches · 3W–11L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Chad Huseman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history14 matches
L
2026-08-18 · Huseman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julian Huseman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
L
Samuel Berryman / Emily Ortiz
2026-08-11 · Huseman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julian Huseman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-04 · Huseman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Caroline Huseman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
Jake Seitz / Guadalupe Jimenez
2026-08-04 · Huseman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Caroline Artho mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-28 · Huseman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Huseman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-09 · Coby Marr · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matt Farley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-02 · Coby Marr · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-18 · Coby Marr · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Barclay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-11 · Coby Marr · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Murray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-28 · Coby Marr · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Howard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
2025-05-21 · Marr · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Howard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
Nicholas Taylor / Jason Wallace
2025-04-24 · Marr · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevin Howard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 42.5% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 45.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
5 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
3 matches
#1 Singles
7%
1 match
#2 Singles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer