← Search

Brett Carlson

Rochester, MN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
114 matches · 84W–30L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Brett Carlson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history114 matches
W
Brett Joyce / Ashkan Paykar
2026-08-16 · #2 Doubles · with Craig Kuberski championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2026-08-16 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
L
Michael Marek / Daniel VerBockel
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Maurice Westerhouse championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
Scott Abdella / Matt Bartell
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Kian Rehfeldt championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
Nabeel Qazi
2026-08-14 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
Noah Anderson / Joe Eiler
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Brett Joyce championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
Darrell Andersen / Ruth Devey
2026-08-13 · Tuel: Team BMs · #1 Mixed Doubles · 3.5 · with Michele Zens mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-07-23 · Kruse-Singh RAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jon Kruse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-20 · Tuplano/Ostlund TBC 18+ 3.5 S26 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · Singh/Carlson RAC 2026 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-02 · Kruse-Singh RAC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Fabricio Amorim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
84.8%
39W–7L · 62.5% of games
4.0
50%
7W–7L · 49.6% of games
3.5mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 67.3% of games
7.0mixed
75%
18W–6L · 62.2% of games
8.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 57.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
42 matches
#1 Singles
28%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
7 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
5%
6 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova