← Search

Laura Panebianco

Wake Forest, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
219 matches · 100W–119L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Laura Panebianco to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history219 matches
W
2026-08-25 · We.Bargoil40C · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Sharon Regnier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-06 · Ju.Johnson40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashley McCollum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-31 · We.Bargoil40T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Beach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-30 · Ju.Johnson40C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashley McCollum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-28 · Em.Kendall18S · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-22 · Em.Rubin18S · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-17 · We.Bargoil40T · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Genevieve Daurity
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · Em.Rubin18S · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · Em.Kendall40S · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-5
L
2026-07-11 · We.Bargoil40T · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Cole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-05 · Em.Kendall40S · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-28 · Em.Kendall40S · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
65.9%
29W–15L · 57.3% of games
3.5
38.4%
43W–69L · 45.1% of games
5.5
50%
2W–2L · 51.3% of games
6.5
50%
21W–21L · 50.2% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 46.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 27% of the time
#2 Doubles
27%
60 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
56 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
39 matches
#3 Singles
15%
32 matches
#1 Singles
8%
17 matches
#2 Singles
7%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams