← Search

David Evert

Hillsborough, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
89 matches · 35W–54L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add David Evert to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history89 matches
L
2026-09-08 · DNagelhout.40C-HS · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Mark Macdonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-20 · MHolt-DUR · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Holt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-18 · DNagelhout.40C-HS · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michael Holt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-08-12 · DNagelhout.40C-HS · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with David Stefan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-15 · TEdwards-HS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Altagracia Evert mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
Barbara Wilhelm / Richard Brown
2026-07-13 · DLiller-HS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Macdonald mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · TEdwards-HS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy Stefan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
Richard Brown / Mary T Long
2026-07-06 · DLiller-HS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Altagracia Evert mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-03 · TEdwards-HS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Altagracia Evert mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-01 · DLiller-HS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dori Liller mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W
Mary T Long / Richard Brown
2026-05-18 · DLiller-HS · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracy Stefan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-29 · DNagelhout-HS · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with DAVID DELINSKY
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
44.4%
8W–10L · 48.3% of games
3.5
22%
9W–32L · 36.2% of games
6.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 41.2% of games
3.0mixed
91.7%
11W–1L · 59.2% of games
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
14 matches
#1 Singles
12%
11 matches
#2 Singles
7%
6 matches
#3 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova