← Search

Jim Vana

SHORELINE, WA
4.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
184 matches · 87W–97L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jim Vana to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history184 matches
L
2026-08-09 · HBSQ-Vana · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Vana mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-19 · HBSQ-Vana · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Vana mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-18 · Suarez · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Gustinis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-14 · Suarez · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Gustinis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-11 · NWW-HBSQ-Rutter · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Deborah Scanlan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-05 · NWW-HBSQ-Rutter · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Vana mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-07-03 · Suarez · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Gustinis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-27 · HBSQ-Vana · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michelle Cohn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-06-20 · HBSQ-Vana · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Vana mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-13 · HBSQ-Vana · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Vana mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-07 · HBSQ-Harbor Squarrels-Robey · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Abram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-05-30 · SOR-ACB-Moore · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Vana mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 51.4% of games
4.5
51.3%
40W–38L · 49.8% of games
8.0
52.6%
10W–9L · 52.2% of games
9.0
35.7%
5W–9L · 44.9% of games
8.0mixed
47.2%
17W–19L · 49.5% of games
9.0mixed
33.3%
3W–6L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
86 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
48 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King