← Search

Jack Bong

Shoreline, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
64 matches · 29W–35L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Jack Bong to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
2026-05-09 · HBSQ-Hoy/Falk · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Pinoe Chu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-03 · HBSQ-Wesco Reunion-McDowell · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Cameron McDowell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-25 · HBSQ-Wesco Reunion-McDowell · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Scott McConnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-18 · HBSQ-Hoy/Falk · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Ben Falk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-18 · HBSQ-Wesco Reunion-McDowell · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Darko Stankovic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-11 · HBSQ-Hoy/Falk · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Luke Barry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-28 · HBSQ-Wesco Reunion-McDowell · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Blake Gettmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2025-12-12 · #3 Doubles · with Marla Kaufman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-11-02 · HBSQ-Shalaby · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marla Kaufman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-01 · HBSQ-PRF-McDowell · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Nicole Bouche mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2025-10-19 · HBSQ-Shalaby · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with KC Mattingly-Nelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-05 · HBSQ-Shalaby · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Marla Kaufman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.5
52.2%
12W–11L · 49.1% of games
5.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
30%
3W–7L · 46.8% of games
5.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
80%
8W–2L · 60.9% of games
9.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 45.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
17 matches
#1 Male Doubles
13%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
8 matches
#1 Singles
5%
3 matches
#1 Male Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer