← Search

Donna Keim

Corvallis, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
100 matches · 61W–39L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Donna Keim to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history100 matches
L
2026-09-12 · TTC-Tanselli/Hamilton · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carolyn Fonyo Boggess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-24 · SOR-ACB-Berky · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carolyn Fonyo Boggess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-23 · SOR-ACB-Berky · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carolyn Fonyo Boggess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · SOR-ACB-Berky · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Berky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2025-11-23 · TTC-Barth · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dianne Tanselli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2025-11-16 · TTC-Barth · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jane Brass Barth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2025-11-15 · TTC-Barth · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carolyn Fonyo Boggess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-11-02 · TTC-Barth · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Carolyn Fonyo Boggess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2025-10-19 · TTC-Barth · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Amanda Degelsmith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-10-11 · TTC-Barth · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Yost
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L
2025-09-13 · #1 Doubles · with Carolyn Fonyo Boggess championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-12 · #1 Doubles · with Carolyn Fonyo Boggess championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
69.6%
16W–7L · 62.3% of games
8.0
51.4%
19W–18L · 51.7% of games
7.0mixed
100%
7W–0L · 74.1% of games
8.0mixed
50%
10W–10L · 48.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 64% of the time
#1 Doubles
64%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
23 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer