Anna Camille Kerr
El Paso, TX
70 matches · 42W–28L · seasons 2019–2027
Captains: add Anna Camille Kerr to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history70 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2022–2027
GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Cartwright/EPCC#2
GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Cartwright/EPCC
GEPTA/18&over/3.5W/Cartwright/EPCC#1
GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Delgado/EPTC#2
GEPTA/18&over/4.0W/Pendergras/EPCC
GEPTA/40&over/3.5W/Cartwright/EPCC
GEPTA/40&over/4.0W/Pendergras/EPCC
GEPTA/40&overMX/3.5/Cartwright/EPCC
GEPTA/Tri-level/4.0-3.0W/Colbert#4
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
66.7%
34W–17L · 54.6% of games
4.0
33.3%
4W–8L · 43.4% of games
3.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 40% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
37%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
14 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.