← Search

Sandi Martes

Beaverton, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
238 matches · 139W–99L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sandi Martes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history238 matches
W
2026-08-14 · WHRC-Ottesen/Zagunis · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Lynn Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-04 · Volley Dolls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Shu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-10 · THPRD-Hockman/Takahashi · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Takahashi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-09 · WHRC-Ottesen/Zagunis · #2 Doubles · 0.0 · with Mary Rousseau
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-07-05 · THPRD-Hockman/Takahashi · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paul Kreiter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-06-30 · Volley Dolls · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Norby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with Lisa Hockman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Lisa Hockman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-06-21 · THPRD-Hockman/Takahashi · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Lawrence mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-06-18 · WHRC-Ottesen/Zagunis · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Judy van Gasse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-06-04 · WHRC-Ottesen/Zagunis · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Kathy Ottesen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · with Paul Kreiter championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams94 teams · 2013–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 70.4% of games
3.5
63%
46W–27L · 54% of games
7.0
63.9%
46W–26L · 56.3% of games
8.0
46.2%
6W–7L · 48.1% of games
6.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 50% of games
7.0mixed
50%
22W–22L · 49.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 40% of the time
#3 Doubles
40%
96 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
80 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
62 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe