← Search

Tim Dagg

Castle Rock, CO
4.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
86 matches · 47W–39L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tim Dagg to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
L
2026-07-14 · CR-MG BLUE · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Alexander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-06-03 · DCHS SILVER · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Isidre Baques
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-29 · CR-MG SILVER · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Edward Kolb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-22 · CR-MG SILVER · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Glen Erickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2023-08-29 · CR-DC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicholas Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
L
2023-08-08 · CR-DC RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Hodnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2023-07-25 · CR-DC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Glen Erickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
Chad Smith / Scott Mannix
2023-07-19 · CR-DC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Winkler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2023-07-09 · CR-DC RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Blalock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2023-06-21 · CR-DC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2023-06-14 · CR-DC RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2023-05-31 · CR-DC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Glen Erickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
57.4%
39W–29L · 51.6% of games
8.0
47.1%
8W–9L · 49% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
40%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
9%
8 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer