← Search

Kirsten Arendes

— year-end
42 matches · 19W–23L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Kirsten Arendes to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history42 matches
L
2026-09-02 · Forest Oaks - Chicks with Sticks · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Monica Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-18 · Forest Oaks - Chicks with Sticks · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Keiko Chevray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-08-12 · Forest Oaks - Chicks with Sticks · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Gabriella Guntur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-22 · Forest Oaks - Chicks with Sticks · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Leigh Robinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-04-15 · Spearman-Sets and The Woods-Memorial NW · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Regina Khim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-04-11 · Forest Oaks · #4 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brent Wassell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-04-08 · Forest Oaks · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Leavenworth mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-06 · Forest Oaks · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Flores mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-29 · Forest Oaks · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chad Harris mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-03-20 · Spearman-Sets and The Woods-Memorial NW · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elsa Piekielniak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-04 · Spearman-Silverados-Memorial Northwest · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Hensley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
Tyler Rogers / Melissa Hill
2026-03-01 · Forest Oaks · #4 Doubles · 8.0 · with Chad Harris mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
Teams18 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
25%
1W–3L · 38.7% of games
3.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 47.8% of games
4.0
25%
4W–12L · 41.6% of games
7.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 66.9% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 49.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
14%
6 matches
#1 Singles
12%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
3 matches
#2 Singles
7%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer