← Search

Diane Skoronski

Lakeland, FL
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
37 matches · 14W–23L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Diane Skoronski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history37 matches
L
2026-06-08 · Grasslands / L. Feaster · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lauren Feaster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-19 · Beerman Family / Ritter · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Clara Copley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-05-18 · Grasslands / L. Feaster · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Gina Barfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-05 · Beerman Family / Ritter · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liz Oenbrink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-04 · Grasslands / L. Feaster · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lauren Feaster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-21 · Beerman Family / Ritter · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liz Oenbrink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-14 · Beerman Family / Ritter · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liz Oenbrink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-13 · Grasslands / L. Feaster · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Lauren Feaster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-24 · Game, Set, Lunch (Beerman) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Liz Oenbrink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-10 · Game, Set, Lunch (Beerman) · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-03 · Game, Set, Lunch (Beerman) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tracey Ritter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-02-17 · Game, Set, Lunch (Beerman) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Leisa Jordan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
41.7%
5W–7L · 45.7% of games
3.0
45.5%
5W–6L · 49.8% of games
3.5
50%
3W–3L · 43.4% of games
5.5
25%
1W–3L · 39.7% of games
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
11 matches
#1 Female Doubles
22%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
5 matches
#2 Singles
14%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
3 matches
#3 Female Doubles
8%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King