← Search

Lindsey Davis

— year-end
71 matches · 49W–22L · seasons 2021–2027

Captains: add Lindsey Davis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history71 matches
L
2026-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 5-7
L
Chelsea Harrell / Michelle Bowen
2026-07-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy James
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elisa Lake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-30 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elisa Lake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-23 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Honey Brannon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-14 · Wild Timber (Ann Olps)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elisa Lake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 3-6
W
2026-05-31 · Wild Timber (Ann Olps)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elisa Lake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
Teams7 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
0%
0W–4L · 39.2% of games
3.5
80%
16W–4L · 60.2% of games
4.0
69.7%
23W–10L · 57.5% of games
4.0mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 58% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
12 matches
#2 Singles
14%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
7 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova