← Search

Erika Schwartz

Brookhaven, GA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
15 matches · 13W–2L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Erika Schwartz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history15 matches
L
Kathleen Shade / Kelly Murphy
2025-07-05 · Sandy Springs TC (Rachel Grade)* · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chase Alifeld
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 3-6
W
2025-06-22 · Sandy Springs TC (Rachel Grade)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Grade
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-06-08 · Sandy Springs TC (Rachel Grade)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Bishop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-06-01 · Sandy Springs TC (Rachel Grade)* · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carly Shapiro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
Holly Carter
2021-06-24 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2021-06-17 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2021-06-10 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2021-06-03 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 6-3
W
2021-05-20 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2021-01-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Lindquist Fojas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2020-11-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Civia Gerber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 6-3
W
2020-11-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Civia Gerber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
92.3%
12W–1L · 63.6% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
6 matches
#2 Singles
27%
4 matches
#1 Singles
13%
2 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
2 matches
#1 Doubles
7%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert