← Search

Sarah Dukeman

— year-end
32 matches · 12W–20L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sarah Dukeman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history32 matches
L
2025-12-07 · CIN C 7.5W CRC Kim · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelley Werner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
Meryl Schroeder / Michelle Brown
2025-11-02 · CIN C 7.5W CRC Kim · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Melinda Brueggemann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-10-28 · CIN A40 4.0W TU CRC Brueggeman · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Buchanan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-2
L
2025-10-26 · CIN C 7.5W CRC Kim · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Karen Fennerty
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Derado
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-0
W
2025-07-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Dudash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2025-05-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Buchanan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
Angela Davis / Carole Clohessy
2025-05-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melanie Buchanan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-1
L
2024-03-16 · CIN Indianapolis, Combo 8.5 W, Ackerman (IRC-D) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Julie Quigley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-01-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Quigley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2024-01-07 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Quigley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2023-03-05 · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
Teams4 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
63.2%
12W–7L · 53.6% of games
4.5
0%
0W–7L · 29.6% of games
7.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
9 matches
#1 Singles
28%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
4 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe