← Search

Masami Hashimoto

Irvine, CA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
235 matches · 108W–127L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Masami Hashimoto to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history235 matches
L
2026-08-29 · OC LPC - Nisha · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeffrey Chen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-22 · OC LPC - Nisha · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeffrey Connell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-09 · OC LPC - Nisha · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Pat Papartassee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-14 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-06-07 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Betty Torng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-05-31 · OC LPC Michele · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Julie Mulrooney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-23 · OC RCI - Hay - Sat12 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jenna van der Meyden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-4
L
2026-05-16 · #2 Doubles · with Thanh Lopez championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-15 · #3 Doubles · with Thanh Lopez championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-02 · OC LPC Michele · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-4
L
Haleigh Crabtree / Melissa Brown
2026-04-25 · OC RCI - Hay - Sat12 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Pat Papartassee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-19 · OC LPC Michele · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Patricia Frazier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams51 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 39.9% of games
4.5
50.3%
76W–75L · 50.8% of games
5.0
14.3%
2W–12L · 29.9% of games
8.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
0.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 58.2% of games
4.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 47.9% of games
9.0mixed
53.8%
14W–12L · 53.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
60 matches
#1 Singles
15%
35 matches
#2 Singles
6%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert