← Search

Virginia van der Geest

— year-end
240 matches · 127W–113L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Virginia van der Geest to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history240 matches
L
2026-03-16 · 4.5 SRP Scott/Jackson W18S · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hannah Thornsburg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-23 · 4.5 SRP Scott/Jackson W18S · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Katherine Shorey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-09 · 4.5 SRP Scott/Jackson W18S · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Valeria Laguna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-02-02 · 4.5 SRP Scott/Jackson W18S · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Meghan Denning Yuan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-26 · 4.5 SRP Scott/Jackson W18S · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Claire Corsmeier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
2026-01-19 · 4.5 SRP Scott/Jackson W18S · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Claire Corsmeier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2025-12-12 · Fall 4.0 PHO Jackson X18F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dennis Munoz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-12-05 · Fall 4.0 PHO Jackson X18F · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alex van der Geest mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-12-01 · 4.5 AGCC Anthem CC Ironwood W18F · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michelle Pacione
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-11-21 · Fall 4.0 PHO Jackson X18F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brendan Pensis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-11-20 · Fall 4.0 PHO Jackson X18F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alex van der Geest mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-10-24 · Fall 4.0 PHO Jackson X18F · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brendan Pensis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
Teams38 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
52.6%
10W–9L · 53.7% of games
4.5
31.8%
21W–45L · 45.6% of games
8.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 52.5% of games
4.0mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 63.1% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 49% of games
8.0mixed
52.5%
31W–28L · 51.8% of games
9.0mixed
65.8%
48W–25L · 55.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
101 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
80 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
57 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer